Home Wrestling Judge Seals Filing After Janel Grant’s Private Medical Records Briefly Leak in WWE-Linked Legal War

Judge Seals Filing After Janel Grant’s Private Medical Records Briefly Leak in WWE-Linked Legal War

by

The legal chaos surrounding WWE’s alleged trafficking scandal just took another sharp turn.

A federal judge ordered a filing to be sealed after personal medical records of Janel Grant, a former WWE employee, were publicly viewable—without redactions—on the court docket.

The unsealed documents were submitted Tuesday night by lawyers for Dr. Carlon Colker, who’s suing Grant’s attorney, Ann Callis, for defamation. Colker claims Callis and her law firm lied about his medical treatment of Grant, who has accused Vince McMahon and WWE of trafficking and abuse in a separate federal lawsuit.

Grant’s lawsuit says she was sent to Colker’s Peak Wellness clinic by McMahon, where she was allegedly given unnamed pills and IV infusions. Colker denies any wrongdoing and is not a defendant in the trafficking case. But he’s now fighting back against Callis, claiming she defamed him in media statements and press materials.

To support his defamation claim, Colker’s team filed a legal brief quoting Grant’s confidential medical records. That move backfired. On Wednesday, Judge Sarah F. Russell sealed the document, citing “a non-party’s [Grant’s] birth date” and “medical records that are the subject of an unopposed Motion to Seal.”

“Given these circumstances,” the judge wrote, “the court finds clear and compelling reasons to seal [Colker’s] response pending the filing of a redacted response.”

Colker’s attorneys later filed a version with the sensitive information blacked out. But the damage may already be done. Grant’s private health information, which had previously been shielded from public view, was temporarily available for anyone to see via the court’s online system.

Neither Colker’s attorneys nor representatives for Grant responded to requests for comment. One of the key questions—whether the unredacted filing was a mistake—remains unanswered.

Colker’s lead attorney, Alejandro Brito, is also representing Donald Trump in multiple defamation lawsuits. In his filing this week, Brito argued that Callis’s remarks about Colker met the “actual malice” standard required for defamation cases involving public figures, though he’s also signaling that he may argue Colker isn’t a public figure at all.

Colker’s legal team doubled down in their brief, writing that “even a cursory review of the medical records supports the notion of patient-initiated, informed, and consented treatments of Grant.”

The case is just one of many legal battles tied to the scandal that forced McMahon out of WWE twice. Grant’s legal team claims that actions like Colker’s lawsuit and the repeated issues obtaining full records from Peak Wellness are part of a broader pattern of retaliation.

In a related state court case, Grant is suing Colker and Peak Wellness in Connecticut to obtain more documents tied to her care. Earlier this month, a judge gave her permission to also seek communications involving Colker, McMahon, WWE, or his staff.

Whether this filing incident was an honest error or a legal tactic remains up for debate—but what’s clear is this fight is far from over.

Do you think Colker’s filing crossed a line by including private medical records—or was it fair game in a defamation case? Sound off in the comments below and let us know your take.

Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment