Home Cycling Marginal gains or major risks? Introducing and assessing cycling’s latest training hacks

Marginal gains or major risks? Introducing and assessing cycling’s latest training hacks

by

Cycling has, since the Team Sky era, been associated with so-called marginal gains, but the rise of ‘biohacking’ takes the envelope-pushing to new extremes. From glucose sensors to DNA tests, today’s riders are experimenting with science, tech and sometimes sheer gimmickry in pursuit of an edge. Some methods are grounded in physiology, others in hype – and separating the two isn’t always easy. We break down the most talked-about hacks, and ask if they’re best avoided or actually worth a try.

Rob Kemp is a London-based freelance journalist with 30 years of experience covering health and fitness, nutrition and sports sciences for a range of cycling, running, football and fitness publications and websites. He is keeping his plunges warm, his blood flow unrestricted, and his biology unhacked

Team GB track sprinter who uses Hytro BFR equipment. “Over time, it developed into a hypertrophy [muscle growth] tool. As a sprinter, muscle mass is a big deal, so BFR became a huge part of my gym work. If I do a BFR primer in the morning, my lactic endurance in the evening session is noticeably better.”

Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment