One of the most important factors to consider when purchasing a launch monitor is where you plan to use it.
Indoor practice places very different demands on a launch monitor than outdoor use. With limited ball flight, accuracy depends on how well a device measures launch angle, spin rate, ball speed and carry distance without relying on extended flight to smooth out errors.
Using GCQuad as the reference point, we compared several personal launch monitors based on average percentage difference indoors. When you look across all four key metrics together, three models consistently stayed closer to baseline data than the rest while one clearly lagged behind.
Indoor accuracy results (Average % difference vs GCQuad (Indoors))
| Launch Monitor | Launch Angle | Spin Rate | Carry Distance | Ball Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foresight GC3 | 3.5% | 2.0% | 1.5% | 0.4% |
| Garmin Approach R50 | 2.5% | 1.5% | 2.2% | 0.3% |
| Rapsodo MLM2PRO | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 0.3% |
| Launch Master Pro | 24% | 17–18% | 5.5% | 4.4 |
Foresight GC3
GC3 delivered some of the most consistent indoor results in the dataset.
Across launch angle, spin rate, carry distance and ball speed, GC3 stayed within a tight range with no meaningful spikes. That consistency matters indoors where even small launch or spin errors can distort carry distance and gapping.
If you want indoor data that requires minimal interpretation, GC3 set the benchmark here. It was also runner-up for best overall launch monitor in 2025.
Garmin Approach R50
The Garmin Approach R50 performed on the same level as GC3 indoors and, in a few categories, showed even smaller average differences.
Launch angle and spin rate stayed especially tight while ball speed and carry distance remained well controlled. More importantly, the R50 avoided the kind of single-metric outliers that can undermine confidence during indoor practice.
From a data standpoint, R50 proved to be one of the most balanced indoor performers in the group.
Rapsodo MLM2PRO
When you look across all four charts together, MLM2PRO consistently posted some of the lowest average differences relative to GCQuad, often matching or outperforming more expensive units indoors.
Launch angle and spin rate were among the tightest measured. Carry distance stayed closely aligned and ball speed was tied with the best performers in the test.
Based strictly on indoor accuracy, MLM2PRO earned its place in the top three and the pricing can’t be beat.
One launch monitor that lagged indoor
The Swami Launch Master Pro stood apart for the wrong reasons in indoor launch monitor testing.
It showed the largest average differences indoors in launch angle and spin rate and those discrepancies carried through to carry distance and ball speed. Indoors, where launch and spin are foundational inputs, that level of variance makes trend-based practice far more difficult.
Compared to the top performers, the gap here was substantial.
Final takeaway
If your goal is reliable indoor practice data you can trust, the separation in these numbers matters and the testing makes that separation clear. Here’s a look at our complete 2025 launch monitor testing: Best Launch Monitors of 2025.
The post Three Of The Most Accurate Indoor Launch Monitors (And One To Avoid) appeared first on MyGolfSpy.
