UFC 320’s best betting props, parlays and picks

UFC 320 happens this weekend (Sat., Oct. 4, 2025) inside T-Mobile Arena, Las Vegas, NV. The pay-per-view (PPV) main event is Magomed Ankalaev vs. Alex Pereira 2 for the UFC Light Heavyweight title. Ankalaev will be hoping to show his dominant decision over Pereira was no fluke. Pereira will be hoping to show us what a one-hundred percent healthy Poatan can do.

Waiting in the wings this weekend will be Carlos Ulberg, who secured his spot as next man up with a crushing KO over Dominick Reyes in Perth last week. He’s not favored to beat either of these guys, though.

The co-main event for UFC 320 is Merab Dvalishvili vs. Cory Sandhagen for the Bantamweight title. Dvalishvili, one of the busiest champions in the sport, will be hoping to defend his title for the third time in this calendar year.

Rounding out the PPV on Saturday is Jiri Prochazka vs. Khalil Rountree Jr., Josh Emmett vs. Youssef Zalal and Abus Magomedov vs. Joe Pyfer.

UFC 320’s late “Prelims” were supposed to be headlined by Ateba Gautier and Ozzy Diaz. However, Diaz has since pulled out due to injury and has been replaced by Octagon newcomer, Treston Vines (details here). Edmen Shahbazyan vs. Andre Muniz now serves as the featured “Prelim” with newcomer Treston Vines coming in on short notice to fight Gautier. The other late “Prelims” are Chris Gutierrez vs. Farid Basharat and Daniel Santos vs. JooSang Yoo.

The early “Prelims” are headlined by Macy Chiasson vs. Yana Santos. Patchy Mix will also be on the early “Prelims”, taking on Jakub Wiklacz. There’s also Punahele Soriano vs. Nikolay Veretennikov, Ramiz Brahimaj vs. Austin Vanderford and Veronica Hardy vs. Brogan Walker.

As always, there’s lots to bet on this card and we’ve got odds for all the fights below:

UFC 320 Main Card Money Line Odds

Magomed Ankalaev (-285) vs. Alex Pereira (+230)

Ankalaev and Pereira fought at UFC 313 in March, with Ankalaev taking a unanimous decision over Pereira. Ankalaev didn’t beat Pereira with his wrestling, as many expected he might. Instead, he was very lively on the feet and hounded Pereira throughout the fight, tagging him first and making Pereira more gun shy than perhaps we’ve ever seen him. He was also able to pin Pereira against the fence for long periods of the fight.

This win extended Ankalaev’s undefeated streak to 14 fights. It also grew his pro record to 21-1-1 (1 NC). His only loss remains that Hail Mary sub he suffered after beating down Paul Craig for 14 minutes and 59 seconds (see it here).

For Pereira, the loss dropped his MMA record to 12-3. It was his first loss since suffering a knockout against Israel Adesanya, which essentially chased him from the Middleweight division (see it here).

I think Pereira is doing too much. Gone is the mystique of Poatan. He’s been over-exposed and over-worked in the last few years and I don’t see how this fight goes much different than the first (and I don’t buy the whole injury story from Pereira).

Ankalaev bossed their first fight, despite not getting a takedown. He exhausted Pereira by making him move and totally sapped his strength in the clinch. I think he does that again and I think there’s even a chance that Ankalaev finishes Pereira on the feet, especially if he wears Pereira down with leg and body kicks again.

My belief in Ankalaev getting the finish opens up a lot of tasty betting options for me. Ankalaev -5.5 at -135 is the most conservative of those options. Under 3.5 rounds is +100, but I think this fight will end very late, if at all. Ankalaev by KO/TKO/DQ is +200 (a little shorter than I would have predicted).

DraftKings also has a very nice same-game parlay with Ankalaev to win by KO/TKO/DQ and over 2.5 rounds at a whopping +800.

If you completely disagree with me there are lots of long odds out there for Pereira. Pereira by KO/TKO/DQ is +320, which has to be the longest that line has ever been in his UFC career.

Ultimately, I’m going to play this fight conservatively and it’s not because I have doubts over Ankalaev winning, but just in how he wins. This could be another decision for him or a finish. I also have strange visions of him getting Pereira down in this fight and, from there, perhaps locking up a kimura.

Best bet: Magomed Ankalaev -5.5 (-135)

Merab Dvalishvili (-380) vs. Cory Sandhagen (+300)

Dvalishvili has been an extremely active Bantamweight champion. After taking the belt off Sean O’Malley at The Sphere little more than one year ago, he defended the title against Umar Nurmagomedov and O’Malley (with a north south choke — see it here) in January and June.

Sandhagen booked his title shot with a win over Deiveson Figueiredo in May. Sandhagen dominated Figueiredo and used counter-grappling to pop Figueiredo’s knee when the Brazilian was hunting for leg locks. The official win is down to a technical knockout (injury), but don’t take anything away from the Sandman for that one. Previously Sandhagen lost a unanimous decision to Nurmagomedov. He gets the title shot here by virtue of being a fresh face, but few would doubt that he’s a worth title challenger for Dvalishvili.

How do you stop Dvalishvili, though?

The champ seems to be getting better in every fight. His motor feels like the single greatest cheatcode in MMA. It’s amazing how he can fight with maximum intensity for five rounds and appear as though he could do another five without slowing down. That must be incredibly demoralizing for opponents and we’ve seen them break in there with him. O’Malley seemed as though he knew the fight was lost after the second takedown.

Dvalishvili also fights with a lot of personality and charisma. That protects him from his style being too boring for the fans, so we don’t get a referee pressured by boos, standing up his opponents. That personality also helps him with the judges. I think his smile and his waving to the crowd helped him get over the edge in some close rounds against the stoic Nurmagomedov. He just looks like a winner most of the time when he’s fighting.

Sandhagen, who is more O’Malley than Nurmagomedov, might really struggle on Saturday. His lanky frame seems ideal for Dvalishvilli to rag-doll around. I think we’re going to see a repeat of what we saw when Sandhagen lost to Nurmagomedov, where he was taken down five times and his jumping attacks seemed too risky to attempt.

Dvalishvili has talked about wanting to strike more, but I think that’s a smokescreen. He knows what works for him. He wants to see guys break under pressure and gas out as much as he wants to see them knocked out, twitching on the canvas.

Sandhagen is a very skilled striker and he has a great deal of fight IQ, but I just don’t think anyone in this division can stand up (literally) to Dvalishvili right now.

Dvalishvili often gets disrespected by oddsmakers, so it’s a little surprising to see him as such a heavy favorite. I think this one is going the distance, so bets which play on that are most interesting to me.

Over 4.5 rounds is, unfortunately, only -360. Dvalishvili by decision is more palatable, though, at -225. Fight to go the distance is -330.

It feels rather safe, but I think I’ll just go with Dvalishvili to get the decision.

Best bet: Merab Dvalishvili by decision (-225)

Jiri Prochazka (-180) vs. Khalil Rountree Jr. (+150)

Both Prochazka and Rountree Jr. are coming off wins over Jamahal Hill.

Prochazka TKO’d Hill, with ground and pound, in January. That was Prochzka’s first fight since he was KO’d by Alex Pereira at UFC 303 in 2024. Prochazka is 5-2 in UFC having only lost to Pereira.

Rountree’s win over Hill was a patient and very technical decision, with Rountree avoiding Hill’s power, yet not really unleashing much of his own. His prior fight was his epic showdown with Pereira which ended due to some brutal uppercuts in the fourth round (see that here).

How this fight goes really depends on which Rountree shows up.

If he fights like he did when he met Hill, then I can see him getting a decision and maybe hurting Prochazka with leg kicks and counters.

If Rountree throws caution to the wind, then all hell might break lose and someone could go down in a heap half way through the first round.

Rountree seems smart enough to fight defensively when he perceives a threat, though.

Prochazka, not so much. He’s going to go forward throwing haymakers, daring Rountree to respond. He might be able to do this enough to pressure Rountree into being more attacking. That could lead to Prochazka creating a big opening. Or it could lead to Rountree landing something big and handing Prochazka his fifth (technical) knockout loss.

Prochazka does have a four-inch reach advantage, so he might be able to chase Rountree while keeping his chin far back enough from the responses.

However, with these two guys it feels like there’s a bomb waiting to go off at any minute and it could blow up either one. Because of that, you have to consider the round total in this fight.

Over 1.5 rounds is -154. Under is +120.

I think this is a tough call to make. I slightly favor the over, given how conservative Rountree fought Hill (who is not as dangerous as Prochazka). Yet, I still think there’s a finish coming in this fight, just not that early.

One of the most interesting striking stats featuring these two is significant strike accuracy. Prochazka has 55 percent and Rountree is just 40 percent. If we’re having a fire fight, it feels obvious to favor the guy who hits more than half the time versus the guy who doesn’t. Rountree did land 56 percent of his sig. strikes on Hill, though.

I’m going to go for Rountree here, but I’m not super confident in it. I don’t know if anyone can be that confident in a Jiri Prochazka fight. I just think Rountree showed himself a blueprint on how he can get wins at this level of the division and I think he’s going to follow that again.

That might bait Prochazka into fighting even more aggressive and reckless and I think that favors Rountree more than it favours Prochazka.

Best bet: Khalil Rountree Jr. moneyline (+150)

Josh Emmett (+340) vs. Youssef Zalal (-440)

Emmett, who turned 40 in March, is coming off a main event decision loss to Lerone Murphy in April. That was his first fight since his viral knockout over Bryce Mitchell in late 2023 (see it here). Emmett is now 10-5 in UFC. His last loss was a five round “Fight of the Night” effort opposite Ilia Topuria for a shot at the Featherweight title.

Zalal is on a seven-fight win streak, which started when he was released from UFC back in 2022. He was re-signed last year and has since submitted Billy Quarantillo, Jarno Errens and Jack Shore. In his last fight, he took a very comfortable decision over former title challenger, Calvin Kattar.

Fights are more complicated than this, but I really struggle to get past Emmett’s age for this one. Indeed, 40-year-olds just don’t win in UFC. Even Jared Cannonier has started to struggle lately.

Emmett has clearly taken care of himself and hasn’t taken a ton of damage in his career, but still … 40.

Zalal, whose greatest attribute is his quickness, seems like a nightmare match-up for someone who is slowing down due to age. I’m sure Emmett’s power is still there if he lands, but will he be able to do that on Zalal, who is smart as well as speedy?

Zalal’s grappling, and especially his back takes, has looked incredible in his second stint in UFC. I think he’s going to have a lot of joy with that on Saturday night, especially since he has a big size advantage over Emmett. Zalal is a big Featherweight and he’s four inches taller than Emmett with a two-inch reach advantage.

That size will make things very difficult for Emmett should Zalal get on his back. Zalal will have lots of room to really lock in his body triangle.

Despite being so high on Zalal, I was a little shocked to see how disparate the odds are here. I think that’s Emmett’s age playing a factor.

The round total for this is 2.5 with the over at -315 and the under at +230. I think the under is interesting, since I think there’s a good chance Zalal gets a submission and since Emmett’s best path to winning is an early KO.

You can get Zalal at -3.5 for -135. I’m not interested in that, just because Emmett is the definition of “a puncher’s chance.”

I’ll stick with the under.

Best bet: Under 2.5 rounds (+230)

Joe Pyfer (-250) vs. Abus Magomedov (+205)

Pyfer is coming off a convincing, but not spectacular, win over Kelvin Gastelum in June. Before that, he KO’d “Power Bar” Marc-Andre Barriault (see it here). Pyfer is now 5-1 in UFC with the sole loss being a five round decision to Jack Hermansson in Feb. 2024.

Magomedov is on a three-fight win streak with wins over Michel Pereira, Brunno Ferreira (by submission) and Warlley Alves. Prior to those wins he dropped back-to-back fights to Caio Borralho and Sean Strickland.

This is a pretty interesting fight. Pyfer is known to underperform at times. And I think Magomedov has slightly overperformed at times, too. Because of that, I think this could be a closer fight than some other people might be expecting.

Magomedov is a very well-rounded fighter and he has some good size. He’ll have a three inch reach advantage over Pyfer. His wrestling and grappling might cause Pyfer a few headaches, too. Magomedov gets 2.65 takedowns per 15 minutes on a very high 57 percent accuracy. He also has a one-hundred percent takedown defense. Pyfer’s takedown defense is average at 60 percent. Pyfer hasn’t faced many takedowns in his career, though. The only men who took him down were Dustin Stoltzfus and Jack Hermansson.

Pyfer’s advantage is with his hands and his knockout power. He doesn’t land a lot of volume (3.74 sig. strikes a minute) and he’s not very accurate (43 percent). But, when he does land, he often hurts you (he’s third in the division with knockdowns per 15 minutes). Magomedov has only been stopped with strikes twice in his 35 fight career, by Strickland (see it here) and Louis Taylor back in PFL.

The round total for this fight is low, at 1.5. That’s a theme on this card.

I’m a little confused by that one. Pyfer has gone under 1.5 rounds a few times in his UFC career, but some of those finishes were right on the cusp. I think Magomedov (whose only time going under 1.5 was when he front kick KO’d Stoltzfus in 2022) should be durable enough to make it through the second round.

Best bet: Over 1.5 rounds (+100)

UFC 320 Late ‘Prelims’ Under Card Odds

Edmen Shahbazyan (-298) vs. Andre Muniz (+240)

Shahbazyan beat Andre Petroski by unanimous decision in June. Prior to that, he KO’d Dylan Budka (see it here) to earn a Performance of the Night bonus. He’s now 8-5 in UFC, with two of his more recent losses being to Anthony Hernandez and Nassourdine Imavov (both by TKO).

Muniz was slept by Ikram Aliskerov in April (see it here). That was his first fight since he took a split decision over Jun Yong Park in 2023.

Shahbazyan is notoriously inconsistent and can struggle in late rounds. However, he’s looked pretty good in his last two fights. Muniz looked very rusty in his return fight and he went down quickly after being caught behind the ear.

I think Shahbazyan might be able to replicate that. This is one of those classic Shahbazyan fights, though, where if he doesn’t get the quick finish he might get taken down and finished in the third round.

The round total for this one is 1.5 with the over at +114 and the under at -145.

I think Shahbazyan is going to win this one, but I also like the over here. Shahbazyan just beat Petroski by decision. Before that blew away Budka in less than a round. Muniz is much more Petroski than Budka, though. If a finish comes here, I can see it happening in round two. And it’s not impossible that Shahbazyan rides out a decision, either.

Best bet: Over 1.5 rounds (+114)

Chris Gutierrez (+340) vs. Farid Basharat (-440)

Gutierrez got a split decision over John Castaneda in April. Prior to that, in Aug. 2024, he got a decision over Quang Le (a short notice replacement for Javid Basharat — Farid’s brother).

Basharat remained undefeated, at 13-0, when he got a decision over Victor Hugo in Oct. 2024. That was his fourth UFC win after victories over Taylor Lapilus. Kleydson Rodrigues and Da’Mon Blackshear.

Basharat’s pressure wrestling game (3.97 takedowns per 15 minutes) is what has him as such a big favorite in this fight. Gutierrez has a very good 70 percent takedown defense, but the threat of the takedown is going to limit one of Gutierrez’s best weapons — the leg kick.

If Gutierrez is going to shy away from kicks and we’re left with a simple boxing match, he’ll have a four inch reach disadvantage.

I think the stifling of Gutierrez’s striking, by both the takedown threat and the reach, is really going to make it easy for Basharat to get the takedown, especially if he can hide it behind his jab. I don’t think Basharat will get a finish on the ground, Gutierrez is technical enough in that department to avoid it, but I think Basharat will get a pretty convincing decision thanks to all the control time he’s going to rack up.

I only have the moneyline and round total odds available right now. If there were handicaps available, I back Basharat enough that I’d take him -3.5.

Best bet: Farid Basharat moneyline (-440)

Daniel Santos (-142) vs. JooSang Yoo (+120)

Santos is coming off a decision win over Jeong Yeong Lee in May. That was his first fight since June 2023 (when he beat Johnny Munoz Jr.). He’s had more fights fall through (16) than actually happen in his career (14).

Yoo destroyed Jeka Saragih with a little check hook in his UFC debut in June (see it here). That 28-second finish earned “Zombie Jr.” a “Performance of the Night” bonus. That was his first fight outside of Asia.

This is a great fight with both men performing wonderfully in their last outings. Santos just beat a Korean fighter who over-relied on boxing. It’s hard to tell if Yoo is as one dimensional as Lee was, given that we’ve only seen about 30 seconds of Yoo in the Octagon.

I’m excited for this one and hope it delivers. I think it could really go either way, but with how Santos performed last time (in landing good combos and getting takedowns), he’s my pick. I won’t be making that bet, though. I’ll just enjoy the fight and hope that both guys have good futures ahead of them.

Best bet: Daniel Santos moneyline (-142)

UFC 320 Early ‘Prelims’ Under Card Odds

Macy Chiasson (-205) vs. Yana Santos (+170)

Chiasson lost a decision to Ketlen Vieira in May. That snapped a two-fight win streak that included a doctor’s stoppage over Mayra Bueno Silva (due to a nasty cut — see it here if you like) and a submission over Pannie Kianzad. She won “Performance of the Night” bonuses for both of those.

Santos, a former Invicta FC champ, got the biggest win of her career in her last fight. In May she took a convincing unanimous decision over Miesha Tate (as an underdog). Before that she beat Chelsea Chandler. These wins have taken her record to 16-8 (6-5 in UFC).

I was high on Santos to beat Tate, despite her being an underdog, and I’m high on her beating Chiasson, too. Chiasson looked very poor in her fight with Vieira. Santos looked pretty good against Tate.

I think Santos’ activity (4.42 sig. strikes a minute) will help her out score Chiasson. I think Santos will also be able to avoid getting taken and held down too much in this fight.

Best bet: Yana Santos moneyline (+170)

Patchy Mix (-298) vs. Jakub Wiklacz (+240)

Mix may have had one of the most underwhelming UFC debuts in recent memory. The former Bellator champ seemed totally befuddled by Mario Bautista’s jab, which he walked into over and over again on route to a lopsided unanimous decision loss. That appearance made it very hard to defend the value of Mix’s exploits over in Bellator.

Wiklacz has been signed right off of KSW, where he was the reigning Bantamweight champion. He’s got a 16-3-2 record. His losses are to Sebastian Pryzbysz (who he beat twice after that) and a pair of jobbers he fought back at the beginning of his career. He’s on a seven fight undefeated streak right now.

Despite laying an egg in his UFC debut, Mix is a decent sized favorite in this match-up.

Honestly, I want to keep fading Mix until he shows I should do otherwise.

That fight with Bautista could be Octagon jitters. Or it could be a sign that we’ve already seen the best from Mix and that, like Michael Chandler, he might just never find a lot of success in UFC.

With the odds so long on Wiklacz, I’m happy to take a flyer on that being the case. Additionally, Wiklacz is three years younger than Mix and has a three inch reach advantage. Wiklacz doesn’t have the grappling that Mix has, but he also doesn’t have any of the pressure.

Best bet: Jakob Wiklacz moneyline (+240)

Punahele Soriano (-190) vs. Nikolay Veretennikov (+235)

Soriano has looked superb since moving down to Welterweight. Last year he battered Miguel Baeza in one of the most one-decided decisions we’ve ever seen in the Octagon. After that, in January, he starched Uros Medic in 31 seconds (see it here).

Veretennikov got his first UFC win in July, taking a split decision over Francisco Prado. Prior to that he was TKO’d by Austin Vanderford. He lashed out at Vanderford after that (see it here). He debuted in UFC with a split decision loss to Danny Barlow.

Frankly, Veretennikov hasn’t done anything to get me excited about his career. Against Prado he kept whiffing on spinning attacks, allowing him to get taken down. He also looked quite tired in the third round.

I’m really buying into Soriano’s momentum right now and I think he’s just going to overwhelm Veretennikov. Despite being a former Middleweight, Soriano is marginally the smaller man in this fight. Whatever he lacks there, though, I think he’ll make up for with speed.

Soriano lands 5 significant strikes a minute with 53 percent accuracy. That’s all pretty mid. But, Veretennikov absorbs more sig. strikes than he lands and his defense is a little low in 46 percent.

I think Soriano’s blitzing will get through Veretennikov’s defenses and put him out early in the fight. Vegas agrees with the round total set at 1.5. The under is +135 and I feel like being bold and going for that, deciding to fully believe in Soriano (which is easier, since I am so down on Veretennikov).

Best bet: Under 1.5 rounds (+135)

Ramiz Brahimaj (+235) vs. Austen Vanderford (-290)

Brahimaj is riding high after back-to-back finishes. In May he earned a “Performance of the Night” bonus by choking out Billy Ray Goff (see it here). Before that, he earned another bonus by knocking out Mickey Gall (see it here). I kind of wish he was fighting Soirano here.

Former Bellator title contender Vanderford won his UFC debut in February. He out wrestled and pounded out Nikolay Veretennikov with relative ease (see it here). That moved his pro record to 13-2. His only two losses are against the underrated Aaron Jeffery and the veteran Gegard Mousasi.

This is a really good fight. And it’s another fight where Brahimaj is getting some disrespect from the bookies.

I don’t see why Vanderford should be such a big favorite in this bout. He has good wrestling and submissions, but so does Brahimaj. Vanderford’s size might give him an advantage in those departments, though, especially if he gets top position.

When it comes to striking, Brahimaj might pack more of a punch, as we saw with that Gall knockout. Vanderford does just enough to get by with striking. I do think there’s a chance Brahimaj is able to hurt Vanderford on the feet, even if he has a two inch reach disadvantage.

If I could get Brahimaj +3.5 I would be all over it. As it stands, I think there is too much risk to taking Brahimaj on the moneyline. I have a vision of Vanderford laying on him for a very long time.

The round total on this is 1.5 and I think that’s way too low. I’m not alone, since the odds for the over are -238. I’ll take the over, though, since I think the moneyline is too close to call on this one.

Best bet: Over 1.5 rounds (-238)

Ateba Gautier vs. Treston Vines

Gautier is one of the scariest fighters to come out of Contender Series in awhile. He’s blown away Robert Valentin and Jose Medina with ease under the big lights, earning Performance of the Night bonuses for each of those TKOs.

He was due to fight the tough, but offensively limited, Ozzy Diaz this weekend, but Diaz pulled out.

Vines has made the terrible decision of fighting Gautier on four days notice. He’s a 29 year-old who last fought with Alabama Fighting Championship in August. He was gearing up to appear in LFA next week.

I’m guessing a lot of folks said no before Vines said yes. I’m worried for this guy, honestly. I don’t think a commission should be booking mismatches like this on such short notice.

There are no odds for this yet, but Gautier could open at something like -2500.

Best bet: Gautier by first round knockout, if you can get it.

Veronica Hardy (-650) vs. Brogan Walker (+470)

Hardy dropped a decision to the improving Eduarda Moura in her last fight, back in November. Prior to that she was on a four fight winning streak with decisions over JJ Aldrich, Jamey-Lyn Horth and Juliana Miller.

Walker, who turned 36 in August, last fought in April, 2023, losing a decision to Iasmin Lucindo. Before that she lost via technical knockout to Juliana Miller. Those are her only two appearances in UFC.

Hardy is the biggest favorite on the card for a reason. She’s not a terribly dynamic or well rounded fighter, but against an out of practise 0-2 fighter she should be fine.

At this time of writing there’s only the moneyline and over/under available. I’ll take the over just because it’s longer odds. It’s still too short to do anything with, though, other than including in a parlay.

Best bet: Over 2.5 rounds (-410)

Here’s a couple of long shots for Saturday night’s action …

Magomed Ankalaev to win by submission (+1200)

I think “Big Ank’” is going to improve on his performance against Pereira this time around. This, for me, means he’ll be able to land some takedowns and get Pereira in some very difficult spots on the ground. Pereira, through both success and match-making, has still not been tested that much on the ground and his submission defense is likely still too raw to deal with someone who knows what they are doing down there.

Merab Dvalishvili to win by submission (+900)

Dvalishvili won his last fight by submission, why can’t he do it again? I think he’s going to be spending a lot of time on the ground with Sandhagen and if he’s able to tire out Sandhagen down the stretch I think he’ll have opportunities to finish the fight. Sandhagen has only been submitted once in his career, to Aljamain Sterling in 2020. I’m sure Aljo was able to give his best bud a great scouting report on how to do that.

Khalil Rountree Jr. to win by submission (+3500)

Put this in the “anything can happen in MMA” folder. Rountree did not bite down on his mouthpiece and go shot for shot with Hill in his last fight and he was rewarded handsomely for that. He might be evolving as a fighter. He certainly seems sensible enough to not want to get beaten to a pulp every fight anymore. What if we see a more well rounded Rountree this time, someone who wants to take Prochazka out of his element (and off his feet). I can see Rountree trying something new in this fight. I can also see him potentially getting a club and sub, or perhaps a guillotine on an overzealous Prochazka.

Remember that MMAmania.com will deliver LIVE round-by-round, blow-by-blow coverage of the entire UFC 320 fight card, starting with the ESPN/ESPN+ “Prelims” matches online, which are scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. ET, before the main card start time at 10 p.m. ET (also on ESPN+).

To checkout the latest and greatest UFC 320: “Ankalaev vs. Pereira 2” news and notes be sure to hit up our comprehensive event archive right here.