The WNBA and the Women’s National Basketball Players Association remain at odds with the current collective bargaining agreement set to expire at the end of this month.
WNBPA executive director Terri Carmichael Jackson issued a fiery response in the wake of NBA commissioner Adam Silver’s recent comments regarding revenue share — a key issue for the players — when he said, in part, “share isn’t the right way to look at it.”
Advertisement
“When the players opted out a year ago, they made it clear they wanted a salary system that values their labor and allows them to grow with the business they are very clearly driving,” Jackson said in a statement provided to The Post and other outlets. “The league’s response has been to run out the clock, put lipstick on a pig, and retread a system that isn’t tied to any part of the business and intentionally undervalues the players. The fact that the league now wants to call any part of its proposal ‘uncapped’ is precisely why its leadership, transparency, and accountability are being challenged right now.”
A WNBA spokesperson, though, adamantly refuted Jackson’s statement, calling it “incorrect and surprising” to suggest the league didn’t offer an “uncapped” option.
WNBPA executive director Terri Carmichael Jackson Getty Images
“The comprehensive proposals we have made to the players include a revenue-sharing component that would result in the players’ compensation increasing as league revenue increases — without any cap on the upside,” the spokesperson said. “It is frustrating and counterproductive for the union to be making misrepresentations about our proposals while also accusing the league of engaging in delay. That is simply not true.”
Advertisement
This is the latest blowup between the players’ union and league amid contentious labor talks.
WNBA players opted out of the current CBA after the 2024 season, with the hope their decision to opt out early would allow plenty of time for the two parties to hammer out details at the bargaining table.
Jackson said in May she hoped to have made “substantial” ground by the mid-July All-Star break.
But players’ frustration with the lack of progress simmered as the season went on.
Players said a meeting with league officials, including commissioner Cathy Engelbert, in Indianapolis at All-Star was a “wasted opportunity” where little to no progress was achieved. Meanwhile, Engelbert said the meeting was “constructive.”
NBA commissioner Adam Silver AFP via Getty Images
After the Lynx’s season ended, WNBPA vice president Napheesa Collier put the league and Engelbert on blast saying the WNBA lacked accountability and had poor leadership.
Advertisement
Earlier this month, Silver said the relationship between WNBA players and league leadership has become “too personal.”
Silver sat down with NBC’s “Today” show for an interview to celebrate the NBA’s return to the network. During the interview, reporter Craig Melvin brought up the contentious CBA negotiations and asked Silver whether WNBA players should get a larger share of the revenue.
“Yes,” Silver said. “I mean, I think share isn’t the right way to look at it because there’s so much more revenue in the NBA. I think you should look at absolute numbers in terms of what they’re making, and they are going to get a big increase in this cycle of collective bargaining. And they deserve it.”
The WNBPA shared the clip of Silver’s answer on its Instagram story, with the caption, “Don’t want to share @adamsilverNBA?”
Napheesa Collier of the Minnesota Lynx warms up before a WNBA game on Sept. 26, 2025. NBAE via Getty Images
The union initially declined to share further comment.
Advertisement
A day later, though, Jackson chimed in, saying WNBA players stand firm in their desires to have their increased salaries connected to a more robust revenue-sharing model that ties their pay to the league’s business growth.
“You know they know it’s bad when the best they say they can do is more of the same: a fixed salary system and a separate revenue-sharing plan that only includes a piece of a piece of the pie, and pays themselves (the league) back first,” Jackson continued. “We’ve come to the table prepared to do business,” Jackson said. “They’ve responded with bad math and are hoping everyone doesn’t understand what ‘uncapped’ actually means.”
The WNBA spokesperson countered Jackson and said the WNBPA has “yet to offer a viable economic proposal and has repeatedly refused to engage in any meaningful way on many of our proposal terms.”
Chelsea Gray, Jackie Young, Becky Hammon and A’ja Wilson celebrate during the Las Vegas Aces’ WNBA title parade. AP
The WNBA’s latest proposal doesn’t include a super-max salary at, or exceeding, $1 million in the first year, according to Front Office Sports.
Advertisement
Instead, the super-max salary proposal is closer to $850,000, and a veteran minimum is around $300,000 for the first year, the report said.
Both are increases from the current CBA. The league’s current super-max is $249,244, and the veteran minimum is $78,831. But the players may argue the increase is not equal to the league’s booming valuation, with some franchises being valued north of $400 million.
Players are hoping for a salary model similar to the NBA’s, where basketball-related income (such as TV deals, sponsorships and ticket sales) helps determine the next year’s cap.
The current CBA expires Oct. 31. While the two parties meet regularly, it seems likely that an extension will be necessary, similar to what happened last time a new CBA was being brokered in 2019.
Advertisement
Nothing can happen in the WNBA offseason, including the draft lottery, expansion drafts, free agency and college draft, until a new deal is ratified.
Both sides are hoping to avoid delaying the start of next season.
“We stand ready to continue negotiating in good faith and hope they will do the same so that we can finalize a mutually beneficial new CBA as quickly as possible,” the league spokesperson said.
The NBA, which owns 42 percent of the WNBA, didn’t respond to The Post’s request for comment.
